looking for

Investment of Remittance in Bangladesh

Since the 1970s, remittances have been generally perceived to be largely spent on houses, food, cars, clothes, and important consumption goods, not on investments in productive enterprises. However, recently remittances have been increasingly used for investment purposes in developing countries, especially in low income countries. Adams, for example, finds that in Guatemala, the majority of remittance earnings are not spent on consumption goods. At the mean level of expenditures, households without remittances spend 58.9 percent of their expenditure on consumption goods compared to 55.9 percent on the part of households receiving international remittances.[1] He explains that households receiving remittances tend to view their remittance earnings as a temporary stream of income thus discouraging them from spending more on consumption.
Remittances may also alleviate credit constraints in the recipient community, thus stimulating entrepreneurial activity. A study in urban Mexico, for example, finds that almost one-fifth of the capital invested in microenterprises was made possible by remittance from the United States.[2] Yang’s study on the Philippines also suggests that an increase in remittances raise household investment in entrepreneurial activities. Specifically, he finds that remittances raise hours worked in self-employment and lead to greater entry into relatively capital- intensive enterprises by migrants’ origin household.[3]
 
However, though remittances have been increasingly used for investment purposes in developing countries but remittances are affected by the investment climate in recipient countries. For example, during 1996-2000 remittance receipts averaged 0.5 percent of GDP in countries with a higher-than-median level of corruption compared to 1.9 percent in countries with lower-than-median corruption.[4]
Investment Climate and Workers Remittance Receipts in Developing Countries.[1]
Climate Indicator
Trend
Remittances as % of GDP
Corruption Level
High
Low
0.5
1.9
Inequality
High
Low
0.9
1.5
Financial Depth
High
Low
1.2
0.9
Trade openness
(export + import)
High
Low
1.2
1.0
Indebtedness
High
Low
2.3
0.8
Country Risk
(based on Institutional Investor Rating)
High
Low
2.4
1.0


[1] Richard H. Adams,Jr., Remittances, Poverty and Investment in Guatemala’, in Caglar Ozden and Maurice Schiff,’International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain (Washington,DC:The World Bank;New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2006)p.78
[2] Woodruff,Christopher, and Rene Zenteno,’Remittances and Microenterprises in Mexico’,University of California,San Diego,2001
[3] Dean Yang,’International Migration,Human Capital and Entrepreneurship:Evidence from Philippine Migrants Exchange Rate Shocks’ Ford School of Public Policy,Working Paper Series No.02-001.(www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/cgsd/documents/yang-001.pdf
[4] Dilip Ratha and Samuel Munzele Maimbo,op.cit.,p.29